The ROI Analysis: Starbucks vs. Espresso Machine at Home
I like Starbucks coffee. A lot. But after doing some math (encouraged to do so by Kate), we realized I was spending a ridiculous amount of money on Starbucks coffee.
After some deliberation, research and ROI analysis, we took the plunge and bought our first espresso machine this week. We're now saving big and drinking much better coffee.
The ROI Analysis: Starbucks vs. Espresso Machine at Home
Pros of Starbucks: Someone else makes it.
Cons of Starbucks: It costs a lot considering what's in it. Miss out on the Starbucks "Experience": including queues (three of them: one to order, one to pick up the drink, one for "condiments"; Attempts at upselling and crosselling ("would you care for a Cinnamon-whatever-cake with that?"); Tip expected. Irritated spouse.
Pros of Espresso Machine at home: Big savings (see below). No travel required. Tastes a lot better than Starbucks. Happier spouse.
Cons Espresso Machine at home: Having to make own coffee and cleaning up after.
Starbucks - Money Down the Drain
- cost per grande latte: $3.20
- lattes p/day: 2
- $ per month at Starbucks: $194.7
- $ per year at Starbucks: $2336
- OMG factor: very high indeed.
Great Tasting Home-Made Lattes with Espresso Machine
- cost per home-made latte (double shot): 60 cents
- home-made lattes per day: 2
- $ per month on ground coffee: $37.5*
- $ per year on ground coffee: $450
The Bottom Line
Savings per year: $1,886**
Bottom Line ROI = 17 weeks, inc. cost of espresso machine*** and ground coffee beans.
--
Assumptions:
* 25 double shots per 1 lbs coffee, at $15 per pound of coffee. 2.5 pounds per month @ $15 per lb (high-end est).
** Does not account for initial outlay on espresso machine, milk, saved gas, nor days away from home travelling on business.
*** Cost of espresso machine + misc. equipment + tax = $500