Slide Show
View Slide Show 17 Photographs

Credit Paul Nicklen, Canada, National Geographic

Slide Show
View Slide Show 17 Photographs

Credit Paul Nicklen, Canada, National Geographic

Showcase: The Best in the World

Before we say anything about this year’s World Press Photo Contest winners, please: go the “Full Screen” button above, immediately to the right of the slide counter, and look at these pictures as they are meant to be seen.

Thank you.

Now. Pietro Masturzo‘s haunting and eerily prescient “From the Rooftops of Tehran, June,” which shows opponents of the Iranian regime shouting their protests at twilight, is the World Press Photo of the Year for 2009.

“What we were really touched about is that this image in some way represents how a big story begins and how protest begins,” said Ayperi Karabuda Ecer, the vice president of pictures at Reuters and chairwoman of the jury.

“There is no big event going on,” she said, “but you still sense that there is something very particular and quite desperate in these lonely little people of the picture fighting something that you feel is much bigger. And we thought, as a jury, that it was very symbolic of how you can actually add layers to news and how you can view events differently from what we are used to.”

Two of the most talked-about pictures of 2009 were honored — both by photographers for The Associated Press and both from Afghanistan: David Guttenfelder‘s picture of soldiers returning Taliban fire (“Man in the Pink Boxers“) won second prize for people-in-the-news singles and Julie Jacobson‘s picture of a fatally wounded Marine (“To Publish or Not?“) won third prize for spot news singles.

Photographers on assignment for The New York Times won three prizes: Adam Ferguson, first prize in spot news singles, for his picture of a bombing victim in Kabul, taken only two months ago; Malick Sidibé, first prize in arts and entertainment singles, for a fashion layout in the Sunday Magazine, “ Prints and the Revolution“; and Rina Castelnuovo, third prize in general news singles, for her picture of a Jewish settler throwing wine at a Palestinian woman.

Adam Ferguson

“I was sitting in the New York Times Kabul bureau editing photos,” Mr. Ferguson recalled, “and then there was boom — the window rattled and I jumped.”

I knew it was a bomb and I knew it was not far away. I grabbed my camera and ran out the front door and started looking for the smoke cloud. I started running and by the time I was halfway there, one of the New York Times drivers caught up to me. I was one the first photographers there, along with an A.P. photographer. We were both delirious and frantic and there was no time to think about secondary blasts. People screamed out and injured people were carried from the scene, bodies on stretchers, blood on the ground and flames raging out of the car that was bombed. The buildings on both sides of the road were destroyed. The bomb was a big one. It had devastated the entire corner.

The police cleared the area and kicked us out after about 10 minutes of working.

DESCRIPTIONAdam Ferguson’s picture as it appeared in The Times.

Speaking of the picture, Patrick Witty, the international picture editor of The Times, said: “It gripped me from the moment it landed on my screen. The look on the woman’s face is haunting. It’s one powerful picture of many made by Adam over the two months he worked for us out of our bureau in Kabul.”

For his part, Mr. Ferguson, a 31-year-old Australian whose next assignment will find him back in Afghanistan, embedded with the Marines in Helmand Province, said he was flattered by the prize.

“Recognition like this not only honors me, but honors and recognizes the issues I photograph,” he wrote on Saturday. “The award is a celebration of my commitment to telling stories, not the tragedy I witnessed.”

Mr. Ferguson is being mentored — long distance — by Christopher Morris of the VII photo agency in New York.

“Having been assigned to be his mentor, I have never met him personally, and only communicated through e-mails,” Mr. Morris wrote on Friday. “But I’ve been amazed at his resolve and pure quality of his work. Very rare to see someone come along like this. Adam Ferguson is someone that has a very bright future ahead.”

Stephen Mayes, the managing director of VII’s New York office, wrote: “When the members of VII invited Adam to join the mentor program, they recognized that his strong eye was backed by clear thinking and unstoppable tenacity — he has all the makings of a great photojournalist. His prominent assignments, publications and now the World Press Photo award prove the point.”

Rina Castelnuovo

DESCRIPTIONRina Castelnuovo for The New York Times

Of Ms. Castelnuovo’s picture, Mr. Witty said, “It is an evocative image not easily forgotten.” He noted, “The red arc ominously takes the shape of a sickle.” The picture was taken on Shuhada Street in Hebron. As Ms. Castelnuovo recalled it:

The streets were mostly empty. I stopped to photograph some settlers marking the Jewish holiday of Purim. They were passing around a bottle of wine, toasting the holiday, nothing out of the ordinary. I noticed a Palestinian woman walking along the shut-down stores. A group of settlers were walking in the middle of the street in the opposite direction when one of them took a step towards her. I instinctually raised the camera.

She didn’t scream or stop, she hurried up the street and vanished around the corner. I was left angered and saddened — as if the wine hit me.

Malick Sidibé

Mr. Sidibé, now in his mid-70s, is a well established figure in Mali and renowned worldwide. Andreas Kokkino, the fashion editor who conceived and styled the spread, has said about working with Mr. Sidibé: “Instead of the usual hundreds and hundreds of frames per shot that I had become accustomed to in this era of digital photography, Sidibé took only two or three frames for every shot. When the shoot was over, he had only shot 22 frames on his Rolleiflex!”

And one of them was judged to be among the best in the world.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

MATHIEU CORREA DE SA February 13, 2010 · 5:02 am

This picture speaks zillions about the absolute need to fight on and on against hate, prejudice, inustice and to support human rights, dignity, peace and humaneness.

I am so pleased to see so many outstanding photographs in this collection. Many people think that, with the internet, crowdsourced news (text, image, video), and the rapid news cycle, that older forms of journalism, such as photojournalism, are past their prime. These photographs are evidence that skilled and intrepid photojournalists can tell stories that no blog post or shaky cell-phone snapshots can. Indeed, such outstanding photojournalism will, I hope, thrive where pictures can be taken, transmitted, and viewed within minutes or hours of an event.

the moment between a shutters opening and closing not only captures a moment but life itself, these split seconds often times are otherwise lost or forgotten, but when all is right there is the opportunity for awe and contemplation.

Good to see recognition for those to dared publish soldiers dying in combat (despite miliary pressure/media self-censorship unlike during coverage of vietnam war) — see AP pix.

Amazing pix. should be viewed in full screen, continuing testament to power of a “moment”

The World Press Photo of the Year is stunning for its lack of content or any other journalistic values. The jury’s selection is yet another setback for a profession that is already in deep trouble. If that was the best of the best, they should have made no selection at all, and I’m hoping next year will bring a more professional group of jurors.

“The photo shows the beginning of something, the beginning of a huge story,” jury chair Ayperi Karabuda Ecer said of the photo. Right. Well how about showing pictures of the story itself, and there were plenty of powerful images from the Iranian protests, if that was what they wanted to show.

A fellow photographer said it was like seeing a photo of Paul Revere putting on his shoes before his midnight ride. There are those of us who still want to see the ride, not the”haunting and eerily prescient” prelude.

Wow, simply stunning those pictures!
Thanks again, Lens!

I’m glad to see photos of small, everyday gestures – one person crying aloud from a rooftop, wine thown in anger – among the overtly violent images of war. Drama isn’t limited to the battlefield – it surrounds us.

David Kennerly and Derek Hudson express well my astonishment (and I am a former magazine photo editor) of this choice for WPP Photo of the Year. Words are for expressing what already happened, might happen, could have happened. Photography is for expressing that 1/8th, 1/500th of a second slice of time in the form of a unique, powerful, dramatic, arresting “moment” that, informs the reader–when it works its unique magic– in a way that words can rarely duplicate. A picture is supposed to be worth a thousand words, not need a thousand words to supplement what it does not say. This choice disappoints completely.

Incredible pictures, thank you so much for sharing them.
I was shocked by number 11

As a symbol of the state of photojournalism it truly is “Photo of the Year”, maybe even the decade. How did people with a complete lack of understanding of visual as opposed to verbal communication end up in these positions where they embarass the entire business.

you’ve lost me Bob…

Irony, sarcasm, Trev.

The “state of photojournalism” is one of meltdown, which has been happening for years. With the outlets and opportunities for shooting and especially publishing classic photojournalism (in the mode of Magnum, Contact Press, VII and others like them…and not to overlook newspapers/wires’ best work), drying up and blowing away or being diminished greatly, the business as it was is in dire straits. As are, along with it, many underemployed / underpublished yet excellent photographers.

So, assuming I understand Bob’s point, this photo represents at least in part what is wrong in the photojournalism world…poor editing and photo usage decision-making, and a lack of historical context and knowledge, and a dwindling understanding of what makes a great journalistic photo and why. The public only knows what it is shown (and must be educated to appreciate and want), and poor choices by editors damage that.

That said, there are always some excellent photos which win at WPP, as always, some that should have, and others that shouldn’t.The pitfalls of subjectivity, compounded on occasion by ineptitude and/or ignorance.

I couldn’t disagree more with David Hume Kennerly.

The winning photo is outstanding *because* it’s not just another photo of the middle of a protest. It does shows many things simultaneously — the kinds of people protesting, the way they protest, even the time of day — and all in beautiful shot that draws me in and makes me want to learn more.

Shouting from rooftops, quite literally. This surprises me, making me realize that protests don’t only happen with mobs in streets, with signs and rocks.

To be honest, it gets easier every day to turn the page when I see another photo of soldiers facing down protesters in a dusty street, blood trickling down a forehead, riot gear, etc. But when I see ordinary women going to their rooftops to shout their displeasure, I’m intrigued.

The image stopped me in my tracks and made me read more, and if that’s not a powerful photo, I don’t know what is.

David Hume Kennerly February 13, 2010 · 5:26 pm

To further amplify my thoughts on the Photo of the Year . . . This is nothing personal about the photographer who won, he was there, and I admire him for it, but in my estimation there were other way more worthy photographs. If you just scan the other categories, there were ample opportunities to choose a great photograph from among them.

If the judges wanted to recognize Iran upheaval coverage, they had only to look at AFP photographer Olivier Laban-Mattel’s 2nd place Spot News Story for a winner. He was right there on top of it, wide angle in hand, putting his life on the line, and has fantastic photos to show for his courage. Any of his were better than what was chosen, and oh yes, they told the story, as opposed to being some ambiguous moment taken from afar of people doing who knows what on the top of a darkened roof above Tehran.

And there were many other strong contenders among the other categories–Charles Ommanney’s wonderful Obama photo as he waited, eyes closed, to make entrance for his swearing-in, Julie Jacobson’s dying Marine in Afghanistan, David Guttenfelder’s soldiers under fire, Walter Astrada’s bloodbath in Magagascar, and on and on. The photos were there, honored as winners in the specialized categories, but overlooked by a jury who might as well have been judges from another planet.

Just my opinion, ok? The picture does not read, speak, convey, tell any story at all, nor does it make the viewer aware of anything . . . on its own and in this case isn’t worth the millions of words being written about it. The fact so many words are being written about it, along with my opinionated points above, should at the very least, give everyone pause to consider much more than why it was chosen! Why all this intellectualizing about the winning WPP picture of the year? What is a good picture? Do you really think this picture says anything to anyone? This picture will only be remembered for the hubbub it’s generated. Show it to anyone anywhere and they’re gonna say, “huh? what is it, what does it mean, where is it, who is it, why is it?” So, again, just one nobody-special’s, opinion; if the judge’s purpose for selecting this photo was to generate passion and dialog amongst the media, press, photography, photojournalism, publication and news business world, the judges indeed picked the right picture. From that paradoxical point of view, it could be they’ve done us all a favor. I do hope that is so.

Thank You Patrick. I didn’t know where to start. Plus to finish on a positive note eluded me in my post.

An appalling choice for such an important award and for such a compelling story. As a former winner of this award (1982), I am embarrassed for the entire jury. My photograph wasn’t art but is surely was news. No caption needed other than time and place. Unbelievable.

Bravo. They are all stunning and very touching. Real art.

I’m with you on this Patrick one 100%.

At the end of the day this is just a photo contest but a damned important one for professionals and as such there is a responsibility factor which comes into play. It is inevitable that year after year their will be discussion and differences of opinion about who should and who shouldn’t have won this that and the other. Nevertheless it is disturbing to see what would appear to be a sharp decline in the quality of judging this competition as has been born out in this year’s winning picture of the WORLD PRESS PHOTO. I repeat World Press Photo!!! It does not take an expert in photojournalism to see at a glance that Pietro Masturzo’s ‘Rooftops in Tehran’ image purely and simply does not tell a story in this one frame. It leaves the viewer searching for clues as to the 4W’s, ‘what, when, why and where’. Is this now the ‘new’ photojournalism? Guess the 4W’s and turn to the next page to see the answer.
Looking through his entire 9 picture set from ‘Rooftops…’ I still am missing out on the 4W’s and were it not for the caption material then I would be non the wiser as to what country we are in, what is going on in these pictures and what does the photographer wish to impart to me the viewer by them.

Taking Julie Jacobson’s controversial fatally wounded marine picture as an example, which despite it’s slight blurriness (or perhaps because of it), is talking to me out loud. I’m moved, full of emotion upon seeing this and I will be when I see it again and again. I am not having to play a hide and seek guessing game, even without a caption the viewer can ascertain pretty closely what the story is. There are many similar examples in this year’s winner’s. Look at Eugene Richard’s stunning ‘War is Personal U.S.A.’ shot. How can one not be moved by this? It incites one to read not just the caption but the entire story.

Looking through the past winners since 1955 to the present //www.archive.worldpressphoto.org/years it is abundantly apparent, give and take a few exceptions, that the winning pictures have been immensely content rich images that cannot fail to stir the viewer. This is photojournalism at its best which we need to be seen in every possible corner of the world no matter what the medium if we are to keep this profession alive in these times of dire crisis. Alas, magazines are going all ‘arty’ on us like they are scared to hurt the sensibilities of their dwindling readership. Lame editing and content decision making are the norm today to the great detriment not only to this profession but to journalism in general. Not so long ago the “publish and be damned” spirit was thriving whereas to day it is “be damned if it’s published”.

Which brings me back to the World Press Photo and this “bizarre choice to put it politely” (as David Hume Kennerly put it) decision to award this all important accolade to a photograph that does not tell any kind of story. For all I know the woman shouting in the dark could be asking to borrow a bag of flour or calling her children for dinner time. Yes, it is a photograph that has a distinct atmosphere and a certain intrigue but that is as far as it goes. If a lengthy caption is required to explain the 4W’s then I shall turn the page but am unlikely to search for the answer.

I’m with David Hume Kennerly in his post # 6 and the statement from chairwoman Ayperi Karabuda Ecer, vice president of pictures at Reuters no less!

“What we were really touched about is that this image in some way represents how a big story begins and how protest begins. There is no big event going on but you still sense that there is something very particular and quite desperate in these lonely little people of the picture fighting something that you feel is much bigger. And we thought, as a jury, that it was very symbolic of how you can actually add layers to news and how you can view events differently from what we are used to.”

I think the jury is out on this, I certainly am…

No, Derek Hudson, you need not read a caption for this picture; if you followed the news on Iranians protesting elections results you would have known that the rooftops of Teheran were a large part of that story. In this picture one can almost hear the woman screams; maybe because I live in the Middle East and the atmosphere and body language speaks to me.
There were plenty of protests images from Teheran that looked like any other violent protest in a middle eastern countries.
I believe it is a symbolic picture that one will not forget. The Iranian story is just beginning nobody knows how it will end.

Mariella Furrer, Nairobi, Kenya February 14, 2010 · 2:23 pm

I definitely agree with Patrick, David and Derek. WPP is an award given to what is considered to be the most powerful and moving photograph of the year. This image most certainly is not that. Firstly there were hundreds of photos sent out via the internet by local Iranian photographers who were on the ground and who risked their lives to tell THEIR story. I am sure many of you saw these images during that time. Many of these photographers entered their work to WPP under anonymous, understandably, and I find it remarkable that none of those images even made it to the final selection.

When RN says “…you need not read a caption for this picture; if you followed the news on Iranians protesting elections results you would have known that the rooftops of Teheran were a large part of that story.” that really says it all. RN if did not have access to the news and you didn’t know that chaos broke out in Iran and you had no idea where this photo was taken, there is absolutely no way you would have been able to tell what is going on in the photo. Knowing what was on the news in relation to Iran is as good as reading a caption.

This image is a strong image but it belongs in a photo essay which is how it was entered into WPP. It is not a photo that stands alone and yes it does need a caption or knowledge of the news to understand what is going on. Without that it looks like women calling across to their neighbours.

Pietro Masturzo’s picture worthy of winning WPP. Its new wave of protest, as Jame’s Scot says it is a weapons of the weak and Pietro capture it verry well…

I don’t mind the concept behind the choice of the photo of the year winner but I just don’t think the photo chosen fulfills the self-declared criteria. It’s certainly not a bad photo but it just doesn’t contain anywhere near enough information and context to “add layers” or be “symbolic” or the event of which it is on the (out-most) periphery of.

In my opinion it would be an extremely rare photography that could satisfy the criteria for a photo like this. Which is exactly how it should be, and I’m happy to think that people are looking out for ‘alternative’ judgements of imagery, but in this case it just doesn’t work.

It makes me wonder if the judges didn’t think up the criteria for their winner before the review, then looked for an image that matched it, and this is the closest they could find.

Dogs bark but the caravan moves on …

Pictures of the Week

View all Pictures of the Week